First, I receive an article, essay, chapter, book section, or entire book from the client in electronic form. I consult with the client to find out what their goals are, what they feel is working, what they feel isn't working—what they have, what they want, and what they need.

Second, I revise the manuscript. This means suggesting fixes as-needed at every level, from word choice to document architecture, to maximize clarity and to bring out the author's own voice. I invariably have questions and suggestions; these I place in comment balloons in the margin. Many clients find that these remarks are the most valuable aspect of the process.

Third, I return the marked-up text to the client for review. The client may accept or reject any or all of my suggested changes. We may consult about possible responses or clarifications to my comments.

A second round of revisions and consultations can be undertaken. However, most clients find that a single round gets the job done. The goal is a text that meets the highest standards of readability and correctness in its particular field—that can be handed without a blush to any agent, publisher, or magazine editor.

I interact with clients in a clear and respectful way. You, the author, remain the final authority over your own work. Your voice, not mine, should shine in the finished writing.

I have published hundreds of articles on scientific, mathematical, and medical topics as well as several peer-reviewed technical articles and prizewinning fiction (see résumé and writing samples). I’m therefore ready and able to tackle a broad range of subjects and styles: science, medicine, engineering, and the humanities.